Unwind Effective use: In the 25th to 50th percentile of all submitted applications Polish: In the top 25% of all submitted applications Indispensability: In the 25th to 50th percentile of all submitted applications Originality: In the top 25% of all submitted applications
Overall: In the 25th to 50th percentile of all submitted applications I'm not really a fan of Quartile classification, and would prefer the real scores, because the score should be objective, and report what the judges thought about your app, and not how my app relates with others, specially, when ALL application s where not seen by ALL judges. Effective use, could be right, since I don't use Maps, GPS or provide LBS, but I do use a lot of features of the platform, to good effect IMHO. I think Indispensability is under rated, since the game is very addictive, but indispensability can be interpreted in several ways. Polish and originality, I couldn't agree more :) I think the biggest problem in the evaluation parameters was their multiple possible interpretations. A clearer definition for each parameter would have been a lot better. P.S. I still have some more stuff to add about the development of Unwind, but not much time to write about it yet. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to android-challenge@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
