I agree. After an extremely controversial ADC 1, I thought Google would try to be more careful about things like this. Android has been advertised as an open platform for mobile devices but we have seen several executions not living up to its name.
On May 20, 3:45 pm, plusminus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Awww no... > what are the arguments FOR that decision ?!?!? > > I'm sorry but (without being told better) I really feel cheated, not > even getting the same chance! > > On May 20, 9:21 pm, Rui Martins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Well, I won't > update my App, until a new SDK surfaces, since M5 has > > too many bugs to be practical, specially, when it involves sound ! > > > What this tells me, is that we will not see a fresh SDK in a lot of > > months... :( > > > And if these poor winning 50 apps have to accept an NDA, they will be > > hard pressed to find bugs with others, in the sense of community, but > > maybe Google will support them directly ! > > > Some headaches are shure to pop in ... being the only 50 catching the > > problems. > > > Somehow, the magic number 50 now seems to have a logic reason from the > > start. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to android-challenge@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
