Insulation has its benefits - and sometimes it looks like unnecessary
complexity.

On Oct 8, 4:10 pm, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> jotobjectswrote:
> > Understood - addinig android.jar would hugely increase the size of
> > your app (by about 3MB)!
>
> > I was just suggesting that you could place android.jar in your
> > classpath for building your "coolfunctions.jar" as an alternative to
> > creating an empty project.  You would build this coolfunctions.jar
> > outside any of your android projects. The coolfunctions.jar is then
> > placed in the lib directory of each android application where you want
> > to use it (which might be a single app if you only want to share it
> > among activities as the first poster in this thread did).
>
> Your approach ("place android.jar in your classpath") assumes:
>
> 1. That android.jar is all you need.
>
> 2. That android.jar belongs in the classpath (vs. the bootclasspath or
> something else).
>
> There is no question that, if #1 and #2 are correct, your approach is
> leaner than creating a project. I recommend creating the project simply
> because #1 and #2 may not be true today and may not be true tomorrow;
> using the Android build framework helps to insulate you from such changes.
>
> --
> Mark Murphy (a Commons 
> Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://twitter.com/commonsguy
>
> _Beginning Android_ from Apress Now Available!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to