Thanks a lot for your clarification on this.
On Oct 9, 6:19 pm, String <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 9, 11:16 am, abarinoff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for pointing to those topic - it's quite interesting. But
> > unfortunately solution of Justin Anderson doesn't help me much as I
> > don't need any additional
> > key application. What I need is topublishbothfree andpaidversions
> > of application on Android Market and ideally user would be able to
> > first download free
> > version and then update topaidversion later.
>
> I think the point is that there's no good way to do this in the
> current Market. If you insist on having free andpaidversions,
> they're separate apps, and there's no way to "upgrade" from one to the
> other. Correspondingly, there's nothing to stop a user havingboth
> installed on their phone at once.
>
> The approach of using a separate key/license "app" is an alternate
> solution to the problem. It's still not perfect, but it avoids the
> double-installation problem, as well as any trickery to keep a single
> code base. It's not the solution you ideally want, but it does
> accomplish an equivalent result, and it works. IMO, it's cleaner -
> it's the approach I use for one of my own apps.
>
> String
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
