The system needs to know the permission at the time of install. If the permission is not defined, it will not be granted.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:06 PM, kostmo <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm having an issue with Content Provider permissions between two > apps. > Basically, both apps define a permission that the other uses. The > intention is for both apps to get increased functionality by using the > other's content provider. > > However, the first app that is installed throws a SecurityException > when trying to access the second app's content provider. > > Is there some reason I should not define my permissions this way? > > I've filed a bug for it here: > http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=4465 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<android-developers%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en > -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer [email protected] Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
