I see no one actually understands Dianne's post. It currently is not possible to abstract a metric $h!+ tonne of low level code from the current implementation. Like it has been said many times, If you want to do it go for it! Its there for you to mess with but don't try to get me to put it on my phone because I don't want it. The code is open. It implementation of this particular code is not. Not because Google is evil but because Google has to maintain a hold on things that can AND WILL be exploited by those that want to do evil. Again if you want to change it on YOUR phone go for it. Its open and if you break it you own both parts.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Greg Donald <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:16 PM, TreKing <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did you even read Dianne's earlier post? She covered ALL of this ... > > Code was implemented to prevent users from making an alternate lock > app. It wasn't some sort of accident. > > Drink the koolaid, pretend Android is open source if you want. > > > -- > Greg Donald > http://destiney.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<android-developers%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en > -- Writing code is one of few things that teaches me I don't know everything. Join the Closed Beta of Call Girl Manager http://www.fuligin.com/forums -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
