On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Jebediah Huang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:31 AM, David Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think you may only be hearing one side of a pretty complex story. > > I want to hear your story also. Where to read this?
Indeed. I'm a long time LKML reader and I somehow seem to have missed this particular discussion. Most everytime some hardware vendor claims ego/politics is the reason they can't get their patches accepted into the Linux Kernel it turns out what's really happening is they don't want to be bothered with the code vetting process the Linux Kernel developers have in place. And that's really too bad for Google if this is what's happening, the code vetting process isn't going away any time soon, you either fix up your code to an acceptable state or it doesn't go in. Perhaps there are egos at play here, but that's not been the cases I've seen in the past, IMO it's much more likely to be exactly how Greg KH explained it. -- Greg Donald destiney.com | gregdonald.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
