Here is my take on questions 1 and 2 (note that I neither work for nor speak for google ..... )
google says that they'll test your submission with the same version of the SDK that you developed the app with. The "gps" provider gets installed with the SDK and the route of the simulation is fixed in the SDK So it is safe to assume that the "gps" provider will be installed on all machines used by evaluators for your submission and it is also safe to assume the the route simulation will be the same "gps" route you see on your machine Ram On Mar 22, 12:34 pm, "Harsh Jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I have a bunch of questions :- > 1) Is it ok to hardcode provider name for the first round ? This means is it > ok to assume a location provider with "gps" will always be present while > evaluating ? > 2) Can we assume the location provider will take exactly same route as it > takes now ? This is important as i plan to create fake data to make demo > interesting around this route. > 3) If I create a web-based console for entering/manipulating data points and > observing the changes on the phone, will judges use it ? This can further > help the submission. > > Also, any other suggestions or pointers to similar discussions that have > happened in past would be appretiated. > > Thanks and Regards, > Harsh --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
