Peli,

I was looking at you Sensor Simulator. VERY Cool !!!

I was hoping you culd help with some thing. What would I be looking
for if for example I wanted to detect a "flick" of the device in pitch
and a flick in roll?
I undestand the orientation stuff. But for acceleration how do the
sensors work?. I noticed that the simulator shows the accelerometer
values when you move the device around. But what am I looking at? I
would have expect the value to go to a certain range, while a force is
applied and then go back to 0 as the force dies down. Is that even
correct?

Thanks

On Feb 15, 10:20 am, Peli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that 4 new functions have been included in Sensors,
> related tosensorupdate rate:
> *http://code.google.com/android/reference/android/hardware/Sensors.html
>
> So there must be someone in the Android team working on that. It would
> be nice, if that person would also decide on the units for compass,
> orientation, and temperature sensors and write this into the
> documentation. In principle, this is arbitrary, but one should make
> sure that both sides (sensorand software) use the same units:
>
> Accelerometer:
>  [X] unit 1 = 1g = 9.8 m/s^2.
>
> Compass: Magnetic field:
>  [ ] unit 1 = 1 nT (nano Tesla)? (typical value: 48000 nT)
>  [ ] unit 1 = 1 µT (micro Tesla)? (typical value: 48 µT) <- I'd prefer
> this SI unit.
>  [ ] unit 1 = 1 G (Gauss)? (typical value 0.48 G)
>  [ ] unit 1 = value of magnetic field at equator, lon=lat=0? <-
> dangerous, may vary with time.
>
> (depending on your position, the magnetic field may vary between 30 µT
> and 55 µT, and it may vary with time).
>
> Orientation:
>  [ ] unit 1° (degree)?  <- I'd prefer this: easy to read, used in
> OpenGL.
>  [ ] unit 1 rad?
>  [ ] unit 1 = 180°? (then [-1,+1] would map to [-180°, +180°])
>
> Temperature:
>  [ ] unit 1 °C (Celsius) <- I'd prefer this, as it simply relates to
> the SI unit Kelvin.
>  [ ] unit 1 °F (Fahrenheit)
>  [ ] unit 1 K (Kelvin)
>
> For temperature sensors, it should be avoided that e.g. American
> hardware producers return "Fahrenheit" while European hardware
> producers return "Celsius".
>
> Transforming between any of these units is easy on the software side,
> but not knowing which unit is being returned is difficult to handle...
> Alternatively, a new function should be included which returns the
> unit used (e.g. "nT", "G", "°C", ...)
>
> Maybe you can quickly contact the hardware manufacturers of the OHA
> and survey on units, and decide on one. (it should not take longer
> than a few moments to forward this message to the relevant people).
>
> Thanks,
> Peli
>
> PS: The documentation of the compass 
> (http://code.google.com/android/reference/android/hardware/Sensors.html
> ) mentions the "degree of magnetic flux (change)", but I think this
> should be replaced by "magnetic field". The *magnetic flux* would
> depend on the area of thesensor, and it would *change* only if you
> move thesensoraround. What you really want to measure is the
> direction of the magnetic field (which is a vector field).
>
> On Jan 28, 5:23 am, Peli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Here is the brand-new SensorSimulator. Please have a look:
> > *http://www.openintents.org/sensorsimulator
> > *http://code.google.com/p/openintents/wiki/SensorSimulator
>
> > I changed the definition of orientation from "radian" to "degree"
> > because OpenGL uses degree as input, and furthermore many real
> > orientation sensors seem to give degree as output.
> > Furthermore, I took "microTesla" as the unit for the magnetic field.
> > It could be specified using nanoTesla, Tesla, or Gauss instead. So if
> > you happen to see any specifications on this issue, let me know so
> > that I can keep the SensorSimulator up-to-date.
>
> > Peli
>
> > On 18 Jan., 20:02, Peli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Dianne,
>
> > > I'm currently trying to write asimulatorto simulate accelerator and
> > > orientationsensordata. The idea is to convert mouse movement to
> > > Androidsensordata. For now I am using the conventions as I outlined
> > > above. I just wondered, if there were any conventions worked out by
> > > Google lying around somewhere, so that I could use the correct ones
> > > right from the beginning...
>
> > > If it has not been specified so far, I'll just continue with my
> > > conventions for now and have to adjust them when they become
> > > available...
>
> > > It is clear that this will not replace testing things with real
> > > sensors, but it could give some early feeling of how sensors could
> > > potentially enhance the user experience and I wanted to play with this
> > > possibility.
>
> > > Peli
>
> > > On 18 Jan., 19:05, hackbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > For these things, I don't know if I'd make assumptions about them
> > > > until there are devices with them. :)  Trying to do anything with this
> > > > data, without running against realsensorhardware, is probably not
> > > > going result in a very good implementation; this is pretty low-level
> > > > data.
>
> > > > On Jan 18, 4:52 am, Peli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hello,
>
> > > > > The android.hardware.Sensors 
> > > > > (http://code.google.com/android/reference/android/hardware/Sensors.html
> > > > > ) currently define the conventions for "accelerometer" and "compass"
> > > > > accurately, but not yet the conventions for the "orientation"sensor.
>
> > > > > Can I assume the following (as a working hypothesis) for my
> > > > > application:
>
> > > > > The coordinate system with XYZ directions is defined as described 
> > > > > inhttp://code.google.com/android/reference/android/hardware/Sensors.html
>
> > > > > 1) The three orientation values returned by thesensor"orientation"
> > > > > indicate yaw, pitch, and roll angles in RADIANS, with values between -
> > > > > PI (exclusive) and +PI (inclusive).
>
> > > > > 2) All three values, yaw, pitch, and roll, equal to "0" (zero)
> > > > > indicate that the device is oriented in standard position ("lying flat
> > > > > on a horizontal surface in front of the user, oriented so the screen
> > > > > is readable by the user in the normal 
> > > > > fashion",http://code.google.com/android/reference/android/hardware/Sensors.html
> > > > > )
>
> > > > > 3) The yaw, pitch, and roll values indicate, how the DEVICE should be
> > > > > rotated starting from the standard position in order to reach the
> > > > > current orientation that is measured by thesensor.
>
> > > > > 3) Starting from the device in standard position, rotations are
> > > > > performed in the XYZ fixed coordinate system in the following order:
> > > > > first the device is ROLLed around the Y axis (positive roll means to
> > > > > rotate the Z vector towards the X vector), then the device is PITCHed
> > > > > around the X axis (positive pitch means to rotate the Y vector towards
> > > > > the Z vector), and finally the device is YAWed around the Z axis
> > > > > (positive yaw means to rotate the Y vector towards the X vector).
>
> > > > > (If I'm not wrong, this should be equivalent to performing the
> > > > > following steps in a coordinate system that is moving along with the
> > > > > device: first yaw, then pitch, finally roll).
>
> > > > > Note that these definitions DO NOT agree with the definitions commonly
> > > > > used in flight dynamics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> > > > > Flight_dynamics), regarding the XYZ coordinate system (e.g. in flight
> > > > > dynamics, the Z axis is defined to point downwards.).
> > > > > But these definitions DO AGREE with the meaning in flight dynamics,
> > > > > assuming that the Y axis pointing away corresponds to the longitudinal
> > > > > axis of a plane:
> > > > > "The most common aeronautical convention defines the roll as acting
> > > > > about the longitudinal axis, positive with the starboard wing down.
> > > > > The yaw is about the vertical body axis, positive with the nose to
> > > > > starboard. Pitch is about an axis perpendicular to the longitudinal
> > > > > plane of symmetry, positive nose up." 
> > > > > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_dynamics
> > > > > )
>
> > > > > I think that the definitions given above feel "most natural" for a
> > > > > device in the given coordinate system, and would be straightforward to
> > > > > implement, but of course it is a matter of convention.
>
> > > > > I would be very happy if some Google member could comment on these.
>
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Peli
>
> > > > > PS: are there also hints about the other sensors mentioned on that
> > > > > page (in 
> > > > > getNumSensorValues(..),http://code.google.com/android/reference/android/hardware/Sensors.html
> > > > > ), that is "temperature" and "pedometer"? Could one assume that
> > > > > "temperature" gives the temperature in degree Celsius, and the
> > > > > pedometer returns the number of steps since the last readout of the
> > > > >sensor? (will this be multi-threaded in the sense that several
> > > > > applications can access the pedometer concurrently in a sensible 
> > > > > way?)- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> > > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen -- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Announcing the new M5 SDK!
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to