Not at all, just wanted the most versatile and robust code for the future. I'll stick with what works!
On Jun 6, 10:38 am, "Justin (Google Employee)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Digit is right, since this package is undocumented, you shouldn't use > it and expect it to be there. Is there something that this package > provides that the Apache HTTP Client library doesn't? > > Cheers, > Justin > Android Team @ Google > > On Jun 6, 12:41 am, Digit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > by definition, anything undocumented *could* be removed in the next > > revision. > > > you can still use it at the moment, but be prepared to change your code if > > needed > > (e.g. can you modularize its use to a single package, for example) > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Danny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just looking to do some http post with some arguments. I've done a > > > simple post to a Servlet using the Apache package, but I'm wondering > > > how correct that is now that I discovered there is this undocumented > > > package lying around. Is one gonna get deprecated or something? Is > > > one better than the other? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
