On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Mark Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thanks for that nugget of information Mr. Murphy, but really how am I to > > dig up a distribution I have no access to? > > My point exactly. > > > I am merely pointing out that the > > download page that Romain said hosts Google's GPL code to hasn't been > > updated (since Feb. 08). > > And if that's what you posted, I'd've had no quibble. > > But you said (June 30th, 1:42am): > > "Interesting point. It looks as though Google is releasing GPL modified > code > for public releases but not for the private, NDA distributions. " > Now that we are into the minutia, a git repository is not a distribution. And yes, I know that GPL does not require a distribution of code, just that the code is available. I am starting to feel like that Chaplin character that picked up the red flag in the "The Great Dictator" Shane > > > And I'm looking for any proof backing up this statement. > > I'm not saying you're wrong -- you could very well be right. But proof > entails demonstrating that the "private, NDA distributions" are receiving > binaries of GPLv2'd code that do not reflect the Git repository or the > tarball. > > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) > http://commonsware.com > _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ -- Available Now! > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
