Hi If Android OS has not been improved from February it would be even worse. I would mean that this project is not well and alive.
If we consider that SDK is not an Open Source project it would solved also many issues but it would mean that the code is all new and not tested and I am not sure that it would be a good news.. But SDK use a lot of open source projects : WebKit, OpenGl ES, SGL, OpenCore, FreeType, eclipse, linux libraries etc... The free side give a big competitive advantage to Android, because Android get very good code, ready made and tested. And Android get a good image and use it because it is 'Open' at the contrary of some competitors. As some of libraries of Android SDK are derivative work from projects licensed under GPL, Berkley etc... it is not so simple to say that Android SDK is not or does not needed to be open source. My aim is not to open a class action etc... my aim is to get attention of Android team on this issue. As Android Team want and say that Android is an open project it would be nice for us that they release last version to us. Regards Andre Charles Legendre --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
