I did. On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:19 PM, jtaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Great! And who wrote Photostream? > > > - Juan T. > > On Sep 12, 7:54 pm, "Romain Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It should be as efficient as using threads and handlers yourself. >> >> On Sep 12, 2008 4:38 PM, "jtaylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> In the Photostream App is UserTask.java. How much more efficient is >> this class then using threads and handlers as normally? In UserTask, >> there's alot of things from java.util.concurrent, threadpools, etc. >> Does this mean UserTask is probably more efficient? In what >> circumstances is it probably more efficient? >> >> - Juan T. > > >
-- Romain Guy www.curious-creature.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
