We're looking into this. -Jeff
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 1:11 AM, goorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are classes which exist in documentation but absent in > android.jar (from android-sdk-windows-1.0_r1.zip): > > android.content.AsyncQueryHandler.WorkerArgs > android.content.AsyncQueryHandler.WorkerHandler > android.database.AbstractCursor.SelfContentObserver > android.view.animation.Animation.Description > java.security.cert.Certificate.CertificateRep > java.security.cert.CertPath.CertPathRep > > In previous versions there is no such problem. The common feature of > all these classes is that they are inner protected classes. Is this > mistake of sdk builders or something else? > > -- > http://www.androidjavadoc.com/ > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
