2008/9/27 jtaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hello Android Team, > > Consider this a helpful criticism. But this sentence is still on the > very front of the Documentation. - "A beta version of the Android SDK > is available for download." and it's been a few days since the 1.0 SDK > has been released. >
Thanks for the pointer...this text will be updated with the next docs release. > This means that the Documentation hasn't been updated. No, certainly it does not mean that. The docs are updated generally on a biweekly basis and with every sdk release. Also the > samples. Again, the samples have been updated, let us know if you have anything specific in mind. No Gears documentation. There is no support for Gears with Android yet. apps-for-android apps wasn't updated > right away though I haven't checked recently. app-for-android is an on-going project, its updated with new apps frequently. Most of them would work on 1.0. If something does not, please file a issue in the apps-for-android project page itself. Classes mixed up. Could you be more specific here... > > Mention of Android-coding-style-standards in the docs but these coding > standards are nowhere to be found, yet they are used in the sample > apps. and here... > > > My suggestion is that in an update to the SDK, everything should be > updated at the same exact time. Since Android is a new contraption, > then one needs a manual. And if the contraption is new and the manual > is beta, then that's a bug. To a developer, the docs are inseparable > from the SDK. > Thats true, and that is how its done with Android. Thanks for your feedback..always appreciated :) > "There are a few new permissions related to the "subscribed feeds > ContentProvider", yet there does not appear to be any documentation of > such a provider. The quoted phrase suggests it handles RSS/Atom feeds > on behalf of client applications, and as such would be a handy > addition to the framework. But, without a documented list of available > properties and such, it would be difficult to use." > http://androidguys.com/?p=1785 > <http://androidguys.com/?p=1785> > > From what Mark said here, it wouldn't be difficult but impossible to > use. :) > > > - Juan t. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
