got it. Thanks Mark.

On Jul 11, 12:38 pm, Mark Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
> That function is only in SQLite 3.6.18+ (see link in my last comment), so
> will only work on 2.2+.
>
> On 11 July 2010 18:31, sm1 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for the tip Richard.
>
> > I added SQLite version display in the two apps:
>
> > )s) Internals for Android 1.5+
>
> > )s) Internals for Android 1.6+
>
> > They show SQLite 3.6.22 on my 2.2 N1.
>
> > The info is about 1/4 down the text view.
>
> > Btw, I also tried to select sqlite_source_id() but this returned an
> > exception saying that the function was not there. Would someone know
> > where this is documented for Android?
>
> > I got the idea for the source_id from:
>
> >http://www.sqlite.org/lang_corefunc.html#sqlite_source_id
>
> > regards,
> > Serge
>
> > On Jul 11, 9:34 am, RichardC <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I have written a quick and dirty test program (see below) and tested
> > > it using different build options against 4 different emulator
> > > versions.
>
> > > The tests were repeated building different build options of the same
> > > program:
> > >   build 1
> > >     android:minSdkVersion="3"
> > >     android:targetSdkVersion="4"
> > >     build target 4
>
> > >   build 2
> > >     android:minSdkVersion="3"
> > >     android:targetSdkVersion="4"
> > >     build target 8
>
> > > build 3
> > >     android:minSdkVersion="3"
> > >     android:targetSdkVersion="8"
> > >     build target 8
>
> > > All 3 build of the test program returned the same result on each
> > > platform
> > >   Emulator running 1.5 returned 3.5.9 for every build
> > >   Emulator running 1.6 returned 3.5.9 for every build
> > >   Emulator running 2.1 returned 3.5.9 for every build
> > >   Emulator running 2.2 returned 3.6.22 for every build
>
> > > Source code (quick and dirty) will clean up later:
>
> > > public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)
> > > {
> > >   super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
> > >   setContentView(R.layout.device_info);
>
> > >   final String databaseName = ":memory:";
> > >   final String query = "SELECTsqlite_version() ASsqlite_version";
> > >   SQLiteDatabase db =
> > > SQLiteDatabase.openOrCreateDatabase(databaseName, null);
> > >   Cursor cursor = db.rawQuery(query, null);
>
> > >   String report = "Querying SQLite for it's version using\n" + query
> > > +"\nreturned\n\n";
> > >   while (cursor.moveToNext())
> > >   {
> > >     report += cursor.getString(0) + "\n";
> > >   }
>
> > >   final TextView reportTextView =
> > > (TextView)findViewById(R.id.ReportTextView);
> > >   reportTextView.setText(report);
>
> > > }
>
> > > On Jul 11, 1:32 pm, RichardC <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Think I have found one ... will upload a test app (if it works) later
> > > > this afternoon and post here when it is available.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Richard
>
> > > > On Jul 11, 9:21 am, Mark Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Is there any way to (programmatically) check what version of SQLite
> > is
> > > > > installed?
>
> > > > > On Jun 24, 1:09 pm, Mark Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Hmmm - this is a bit worrying, isn't it? How to possibly test SQL
> > which can
> > > > > > potentially run so differently on different devices?
>
> > > > > > One starting point would be get a list of SQLite version numbers on
> > each
> > > > > > device available...
>
> > > > > > 2010/6/24 Tomáš Hubálek <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > > SQL Lite is definitely simpler but in Oracle it sometimes happens
> > that the
> > > > > > > same SQL has very different performance on different versions
> > because of
> > > > > > > different explain plan.
>
> > > > > > > Tom
>
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Mark Carter <
> > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > >> True - though the SQL is a little complex and I'd like to
> > simplify it
> > > > > > >> before posting.
>
> > > > > > >> However, whatever the SQL is, there has to be an explanation for
> > the
> > > > > > >> different outcome.
>
> > > > > > >> 2010/6/24 Tomáš Hubálek <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > >> Maybe full SQL would give more clue...
>
> > > > > > >>> Tom
>
> > > > > > >>> On 24 čvn, 10:13, Mark Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >>> > Same data, same code, but different results on these two
> > devices.
>
> > > > > > >>> > On the Nexus One, the (INNER JOIN) query runs (first call to
> > > > > > >>> > Cursor.moveToNext()) after a fraction of a second but on the
> > Hero it
> > > > > > >>> > just hangs.
>
> > > > > > >>> > I haven't been able to reduce the scenario to something
> > simple yet,
> > > > > > >>> > but it seems to involve using OR within an ON clause.
>
> > > > > > >>> > Anyone know why there might be a difference on these two
> > devices?
>
> > > > > > >>> --
> > > > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > > >>> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > > > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > >>> [email protected]<android-developers%2Bunsubs
> > > > > > >>>  [email protected]><android-developers%2Bunsubs
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>
> > > > > > >>  --
> > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > > >> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > >> [email protected]<android-developers%2Bunsubs
> > > > > > >>  [email protected]><android-developers%2Bunsubs
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>
> > > > > > > --
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------------------
> > > > > > > Tom Hubalek ([email protected]),
> > > > > > >http://android.hubalek.net,http://blog.hubalek.net/
> > > > > > >http://facebook.com/thubalek,http://www.linkedin.com/in/thubalek
> > > > > > >http://twitter.com/thubalek,http://twitter.com/android_dev_tom
>
> > > > > > >  --
> > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > > > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > [email protected]<android-developers%2Bunsubs
> > > > > > >  [email protected]><android-developers%2Bunsubs
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<android-developers%2Bunsubs 
> > [email protected]>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to