Not all services are local. I guess that's the main reason for async protocol, which assumes the most general case. But then again, only developers of Android know for sure :-)
-- Kostya Vasilyev -- http://kmansoft.wordpress.com 30.07.2010 1:01 пользователь "Jeroen Kransen" <[email protected]> написал: Thank you so much, Kostya! Indeed it turns out to be an asynchronous call. It makes the design of the Activity slightly more verbose, but at least I got it working. Are there imperative reasons why the service is not returned synchronously? Is it very costly to (instantiate and) return a local Service? If not, it would be a nice feature to have the bindService block, or at least to have the option through a method parameter that we want to wait for it like bindService(..., boolean willWait). Thanks again! Jeroen On 29 jul, 22:32, Kostya Vasilyev <[email protected]> wrote: > If I remember right, starting a ser... > 30.07.2010 0:21 пользователь "Jeroen Kransen" <[email protected]> написал: > > This is the only serious logging I get in LogCat. Sometimes after that > I get a timeout on the ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" g... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
