Thanks to both of you for sharing your experiences rolling this out. I have to say, the fear of false negatives is holding me back from deploying LVL in my own apps.
This is also exacerbated by the lack of meaningful Market support for either users or developers. As it is, I'm fielding several emails a day from users with various Market problems, most commonly stuck downloads. There's very little I can do for these folks, but I also understand that they have nowhere else to turn. If I roll out LVL, and users have trouble with it, there's going to be even less I can do to help them. And that's a sure recipe for 1* comments, quickly followed by declining sales. String On Aug 9, 7:55 am, a1 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Do you use default policy implementation provided with LVL > (ServerManagedPolicy)? With 10k user base I received about 10 "can't > validate" reports, and rollback LVL. > > -- > Bart Janusz (Beepstreet) > > On 8 Sie, 11:37, Pent <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > LVL has been in use for around 48 hours with my modest several > > thousand users and I havn't had a single case of 'couldn't validate' > > so it's looking good, fingers crossed. > > > Thanks Googlers! > > > I don't believe that in itself it's in any way 'secure' but it at > > least means that each update has to be individually hacked which is a > > huge step forward IMO. > > > Pent > > > p.s. bit more advance notice next time would be great... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
