How about speed? which one is fast? On Sep 15, 5:59 pm, Indicator Veritatis <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, we know why. Because Apache's HttpClient (and other closely > assoc. classes in the org.apache.http package) is a much better API > than Sun's own HttpUrlConnection (and the rest of java.net's Http > support). You can do far more work with less code, and it reads much > better too. > > So, for example, HttpClient has helper classes that help you deal with > spinning off a worker thread and doing all the waiting on HTTP there; > it is designed to work well asynchronously. Sun's HttpUrlConnection > has nothing of the sort. > > That said, you don't get to depart from using java.net entirely. You > should still use it for dealing with URIs and URLs. But not for much > more. > > On Sep 15, 2:41 pm, cindy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I was told it was prefer to use Apache's library HttpClient, instead > > of java's Http URLConnection. Does any one know why? > > > Thanks! > > > Cindy
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
