I'm glad we can finally talk about this. http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2010/09/more-countries-more-sellers-more-buyers.html
Cheers, Dan - Dan Galpin Developer Advocate Google, Inc. - If you actually want answers to your questions, it's far better to post them here, because the collective brain of this forum far exceeds my own. - On Sep 24, 12:54 am, gjs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd love to be in a position of being concerned about piracy, LVL, > Progard & obfuscated stack traces. > > But alas I'm still one of the many dev's situated in a region > (Australia) were I can buy apps from the Android Market but not > publish a paid app. > > This is a big ongoing disincentive and leaves me to just publish free > apps for kudos alone. > > Regards > > Plugs his free app anyway - > > Imageotag is a precision field camera app for Android V1.5+ devices. > Imageotag snaps 16:9 geo-tagged images, embedding GPS & NET location, > accelerometer, bearing, compass, date, light lux, magnetic field, > pitch, proximity, roll, speed, temperature & time data. > Imageotag creates Google Earth Tours from GPS image sequences. > > http://www.imageotag.com > > On Sep 24, 5:04 pm, Indicator Veritatis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Google has too long a history of stonewalling and foot dragging. You > > NEED that kind of 'motivation' -- unless you finally learn to take > > responsibility for committing to fix your bugs without such unpleasant > > prodding. > > > When, for example, are you going to fix AAC+ support in StageFright? > > When will you fix 5211? It has been open since Dec 4, 2009! And what > > about 2207? It has been open for longer, since March 2009. And it is > > much more serious. You are losing customers because of this bug, yet > > you do nothing. > > > Finally, would you consider the previous poster's proposal of "running > > for the hills" more motivating? Which would you rather have? > > Developers abandoning the Android platform because of the poor > > prognosis for Proguard, or developers who stick with the platform but > > loudly call for badly needed change? > > > On Sep 23, 9:34 pm, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Indicator Veritatis > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > But rather than run for the hills, we should pepper Google with > > > > uncomplimentary speculations concerning their motives for this "turd > > > > layering" until they 'fess up and give us a release date for a version > > > > of ADT that will allow us to include Proguard in an Eclipse build > > > > WITHOUT these problems. > > > > You sure know how to motivate people. > > > > -- > > > Dianne Hackborn > > > Android framework engineer > > > [email protected] > > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > > > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such > > > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see > > > and > > > answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
