> Better for Developers > 1. Rather then Fighting for root this could be Straight Access to > Device > 2. No More Hacking and Exploits needed.
I've been developing my application just fine without any "fighting for root" or exploits. > 3. Building Firmware, API, Services, Codes which need Root Access > can be Tested with Device rather then Emulator. I haven't found any need to build firmware, other than as an academic exercise, and my applications don't have any "codes which need root access". What would be the point of developing apps that need root access or exploits, when you won't be able to deploy them to customers? > 4. Customizing OS and using it for Self and Distributing it to user > who can take risk may get easy Access to Mods. How would you distribute it to users, since users wouldn't be able to install it on their phones? > 5. Google Should Protect Recovery Image and Boot Image from being > Flashed this will reduce Bricking Issue. Have people had problems with losing their recovery image and boot image? How did they accomplish that? It seems to me that if you want Android without the security, you can just build it yourself and run it on hardware other than the G1. No one ever promised that the G1 would be a good platform for people that want to run non-standard builds of Android. In fact, it's actually *better* for developers that it's hard to run a non-standard build of Android on the G1, because it gives developers a reasonably stable target for their applications. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
