Don't think they can remove it as it is part of the Android Compatibility Definition Document that ODMs have to go through. http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/source.android.com/en/us/compatibility/android-2.2-cdd.pdf See section 4.
At least if you implement OpenGL ES 2.0 you need to have Replica Island working. On Oct 24, 8:22 pm, Indicator Veritatis <[email protected]> wrote: > Almost true; but even if it were true, that is not good enough. Sample > code does not have to be finalize, robust, professional code, but > since it IS the example the company is holding out as a good example > of how to code something, it really should not be as bad as Lunar > Lander is. > > That is, there are certain things you can leave to the implementer of > the professional version, and there are certain things that even the > author of the sample code must get right: Lunar lander did not get the > latter right. They really should either fix it or remove it -- it > really is that bad! > > On Oct 22, 1:00 am, Doug <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I would have to say it contains no more errors per line of code than > > the subject of your message. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
