On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:20 AM, sombre <[email protected]> wrote: > So, I'd like to request to please add a third predefined policy to cater to > our laziness. A policy that is the counterpart to the actual old 'copy > protection' thingy. Thanks! >
Would you like to place an order for someone to make your app for you while you're at it? I'd like to request you a) don't include us all in *your* laziness claim and b) learn to build things that aren't already handed to you. Thanks! I mean, seriously, do you honestly expect someone from Google to read this, drop what they're doing, and get to work making this for you? > Apart from this I don't really see why an app that has been correctly > installed by the market with device-based signature checks and all really > needs to be checked every 5 days? > Wouldn't that only make sense if the app is sort of subscription-based? > Once scenario: I buy the app, open it, it verifies it's legit, I copy it and it's data, ask for a refund, then re-install the backup, which has passed verification. Thanks for the free app. That's just one idea. I'm sure there are smarter and more elaborate ways to defeat a one-time check. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TreKing <http://sites.google.com/site/rezmobileapps/treking> - Chicago transit tracking app for Android-powered devices -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
