On Dec 11, 9:12 pm, DulcetTone <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree... I find the change in trial period a step backward.

I'm happy about one thing: at least the 15 minute limit will get rid
of the "I completed this game in 1 hour - uninstalled" crowd. I don't
have any apps of that kind myself, but every time I read a comment of
this kind on a $1 app, I just get annoyed on behalf of the afflicted
developer; it's such an abuse of the system.

Regards,

Michael A.


> On Dec 11, 7:09 am, Pent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > No offense, but the fact that you don't have a trial app is a really a
> > > bit tricking people into buying the app.  A large percentage of people
> > > are too timid, don't know, procrastinate, etc, to get a refund.  I
> > > think if you have an expensive app, it's almost mandatory to have some
> > > sort of free version.  Just my two cents.
>
> > No offense taken, the thought hadn't even occured to me.
>
> > Nevertheless, it's another change from the Market that requires major
> > action with hardly any notice.
> > and which I don't believe they'd get away with without a de facto
> > monopoly.
>
> > Pent
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to