Before, I was just prefixing with com.mycompanyname.myappname but this is broken when using the lite/pro model.
Now I prefix with myapppackagename which is something like com.mycompanyname.myappname.pro I still find the meta-data approach cumbersome so is there a better way? On 14 December 2010 12:26, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Mark Carter <[email protected]>wrote: > >> My current approach is to always specify an authority using the app >> package name as a prefix. This guarantees uniqueness. >> > > You should prefix with your package name, anyway, to ensure you don't > conflict with someone else's app. > > -- > Dianne Hackborn > Android framework engineer > [email protected] > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and > answer them. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<android-developers%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
