Thanks, Diego, I could do that, but before doing that want to confirm if InstrumentationTestRunner supports my custom annotations or not.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Diego Torres Milano <[email protected]>wrote: > If you want to provide a different behavior for the test runner just > create your own extending it: > > public class MyTestRunner extends > android.test.InstrumentationTestRunner { > // do wathever you want > } > > To do whatever you want, use android.test.InstrumentationTestRunner > source as a an inspiration. > > > On Jan 13, 1:47 am, Aman Bhardwaj <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have some test cases with my own defined Annotations, but > > InstrumenationTestRunner doesn't runs tests based on annotation. > > However it works if I add annotations > > from android.test.suitebuilder.annotation. > > > > Is it only supposed to work with annotations > > in android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Smoke? > > Any suggestions how to make it work with my own annotations. > > > > Thanks, > > ~Aman > > -- > Have you read my blog ? > http://dtmilano.blogspot.com > android junit tests ui linux cult thin clients > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<android-developers%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
