System.exit() as a feature for the paranoid user? I wish that were
never necessary. But there is yet another case where I wish I had the
app calling system.exit() itself: when the app has done a bad job of
keeping track of state, and leaves the user, yes, even the
sophisticated user, with no idea how to navigate back to a known good
state in the menu tree. Then the only way for me to get the app back
to the top of the tree is to kill it with SystemExit (the application,
not the API) and start it again.

One of the promised benefits of certain competing Android Application
Markets is that the Market staff will verify the program the developer
submits, checking for stupid errors like this one, as well as other
failures to do Android Lifecycle management correctly before approving
the application for distribution. But I haven't had enough experience
with them yet to know whether they keep this promise or not. They may
have found they bit off more than they could chew.

On Apr 25, 4:49 pm, lbendlin <[email protected]> wrote:
> oh yes there is. It is called "paranoid user" and that species will accuse
> your program of draining the battery, heating the atmosphere, and scaring
> little children.  No matter how often you explain to them how Android keeps
> applications around "just in case" they want that EXIT button. They get
> their button, and I can keep my sanity (well, sort of).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to