On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Eric <e...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > I am glad this change was made, it makes more logical sense to me to > do it this way. Hopefully the documentation can also be updated to > remove any doubt whatsoever that an Activity cannot possibly be > 'removed' from memory in low-memory situations (when the process is > _not_ killed), that would result in an inconsistent or leak state by > not having balanced lifecycle methods called. >
The only thing that happens in low-memory situations is processes being killed. -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
