Ok, thanks. So it seems like an arbitrary limitation since there is no real reason why the compiler couldn't look at the method signature like it does in every other case.
On May 20, 11:11 pm, Kostya Vasilyev <[email protected]> wrote: > 20.05.2011 18:24, Streets Of Boston ?????: > > > And i'm still not sure why the compiler can't pick up the same info > > from the 's' parameter declaration of the method 'method'.... > > This has some interesting stuff on Java's type inference for generics: > > http://www.angelikalanger.com/GenericsFAQ/FAQSections/TechnicalDetail... > > My impression is, there are several special cases where the type is > inferred, one of them being assignment. > > The page has examples where type inference doesn't work, and suggests > using a temporary variable to help the compiler, just as was discovered. > > -- > Kostya Vasilyev --http://kmansoft.wordpress.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
