Dan, Well would you explain your comment to me, if not Dianne? I have quite a few years of development experience under my belt and would like to understand what you mean by that. I have no axe to grind here and I promise not to p*** on you.
...Jake >>>>> "D" == DanH <[email protected]> writes: D> I figured you would, and I'm not interested in getting into a D> p***ing match, so I'm not going to elaborate. D> On May 24, 11:09 am, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:29 AM, DanH <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Additionally, Android, as it's currently designed, does not have >> > "legs". The process model and UI are both too restrictive to be >> > extendable to the pads and other new paradigms of the future. >> >> Care to explain that? I very much disagree. >> >> -- >> Dianne Hackborn >> Android framework engineer >> [email protected] >> >> Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to >> provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such >> questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and >> answer them. D> -- D> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google D> Groups "Android Developers" group. D> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] D> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to D> [email protected] D> For more options, visit this group at D> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- Jake Colman -- Android Tinkerer -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
