I'm cross-posted. I was getting crickets over there. On Aug 18, 12:10 pm, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Joe Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does anybody know how to compile Android jars that keep their real > > implementations (no "Stub!" exceptions) but respect the public API by > > hiding the @hide annotated entities? Perhaps they are already output > > by the build and I just need to know where they were? > > > I needed access to the "real Android jars" with actual implementations > > for work we are doing on the Robolectric android testing framework > > (http://robolectric.org). I built android and harvested classes.jar > > from out/target/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/framework_intermediates. > > > But, I see that these jars still have many public entities that would > > normally be hidden because they have the pseudo-annotation of @hide. > > This makes it hard to use these jars; for example subclasses often are > > forced to implement abstract methods marked @hide. Ideally we would be > > able to switch between using SDK jars and real-jars depending on the > > scenario, but this is hard because they have different public APIs. > > Thanks in advance! > > You'll probably have better luck with this question over on one of the > Google Groups listed athttp://source.android.com, since building the > firmware/SDKs is the province of that site. > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons > Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://github.com/commonsguyhttp://commonsware.com/blog|http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > Warescription: Three Android Books, Plus Updates, One Low Price!
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
