aha, GG! :-) On Aug 24, 11:03 pm, b0b <[email protected]> wrote: > As it is a hack using private API it might break, sure. But I don't > expect it to break before 2038 :). If it breaks it's not fatal for the > app (crash). Btw above code snippet should catch Throwable to catch > potential although unlikely UnsatisfiedLinkError. > > I've tested above code on 2 devices, with and without WMA support. > > With slight modifications, above hack can detect WMV support as well. > > No need to say to resort to such hacks sucks... > > On Aug 24, 4:32 pm, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Are you sure that AUDIO_DECODER_WMA will always be the 0th indexed > > object in the constants array? I haven't looked at the code, and I > > haven't tried getting at an enum via reflection. That's the big thing > > that leaps out at me (besides the private APIs issue you mention). > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:13 AM, b0b <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In the meantime the abomination belows works. I know: "...private > > > api...might break....evil...don't do this...." > > > What's really missing is a public API to enumerate decoders and their > > > capabilities (in particular is decoding supported over HTTP). > > > > public Boolean isWMASupported() { > > > > try { > > > Class decoderCapabilitiesClass = > > > Class.forName("android.media.DecoderCapabilities"); > > > > Class audioDecoderClass = > > > Class.forName("android.media.DecoderCapabilities$AudioDecoder"); > > > Object constants[] = > > > audioDecoderClass.getEnumConstants(); > > > if(constants == null || constants.length == 0) > > > return null; > > > > Object AUDIO_DECODER_WMA = constants[0]; > > > > Method getAudioDecodersMethod = > > > decoderCapabilitiesClass.getMethod("getAudioDecoders"); > > > > List decoders = > > > (List)getAudioDecodersMethod.invoke(null); > > > for(Object decoder : decoders) { > > > if(decoder.equals(AUDIO_DECODER_WMA)) > > > return true; > > > } > > > return false; > > > > } catch (Exception e) { > > > return null; > > > } > > > > } > > > > On Aug 24, 12:51 pm, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:39 AM, b0b <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > If only google in its immense wisdom had provided > > >> > MediaPlayer.isMimeTypeSupported()... > > > >> Yes, it's a stunning omission. > > > >> -- > > >> Mark Murphy (a Commons > > >> Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://github.com/commonsguyhttp://commonsware.com/blog|http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > > >> Android App Developer Books:http://commonsware.com/books > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Android Developers" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected] > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en > > > -- > > Mark Murphy (a Commons > > Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://github.com/commonsguyhttp://commonsware.com/blog|http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > > Android Training in Oslo:http://bit.ly/fjBo24
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
