On Sep 1, 2:13 pm, Sheado <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > We just got our Lodsys notice as well. This is ridiculous and a direct > obstacle to innovation in the US. > > Any other advice on how to handle this? Would it be possible for all > of us developers to join together in a class-action lawsuit? > > -Chad > > On Aug 28, 9:56 am, Russell DuRoss <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Their site suggests they are interested in engaging in a discussion > > about an appropriate licensing amount. So maybe respond to them > > indicating that you are willing to negotiate and in the same response > > include enough info so they can see that you are a small developer. > > When they see your response there is maybe a chance that they will > > decide it's not worth their effort to pursue it. If so, you may then > > never hear from them again. Are there any small developers out there > > that have done this? > > > On Aug 27, 10:23 am, Andy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm only accused for 7,222,078 (the in app billing) > > > > beside my app has no in-app purchase or upgrade. It's simply a http link > > > to > > > the android market.I think they are sure that their patent covers the > > > process behind this....?!?!. But if so, this would ment, that even > > > web-Applications are not allowed to link to a amazon store or something > > > similar. This patent is so common sense / so widely interpretable that I > > > think this will not last "that long".- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
I'd have to see it myself, but I imagine, I would ignore the letter If I were in your shoes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
