On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:00 AM, John Goche <[email protected]> wrote: > When I > use Eclipse IDE it tells me but when I use some editor outside of Eclipse it > does not.
Other IDEs might (e.g., IntelliJ). Compilers will. Plain editors will not, but that is not exactly Android's fault. > IMHO if an abstract method is implemented it should not be labeled abstract > in the android documentation. Ah, I think I see what you're complaining about. Yes, I can see how that would be mildly confusing. For most classes, you can examine their implementation via Google Code Search, to confirm what is implemented and what is not. > Anyhow, I will read your excerpt.pdf from your book. Maybe I will find an > answer there. Not on the BaseAdapter point, at least in that excerpt. That excerpt was for your confusion regarding row recycling. I don't specifically cover BaseAdapter per se, simply because it's not used quite as often as ArrayAdapter and CursorAdapter. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy Android 3.1 Programming Books: http://commonsware.com/books -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
