On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Studio LFP <studio....@gmail.com> wrote: > If you look at the history of developers, we're already use to having to > deal with a lot worse fragmentation issues than Android. Anyone that's ever > developed a website correctly knows that supporting the available web > browsers is a lot more of a challenge than with Android versions.
I disagree. <!--[if IE 6]> is not challenging whatsoever compared to getting your apps working well on lots of different Android devices running lots of different SKD versions and resolutions. > Windows, Mac OSX, a ton of server technologies, databases, etc., they all > have tons of different versions available to support. Most companies stick > with older versions because it is what they have and it is working. When it > comes to Android, I've been pleasantly surprised at the efforts Google has > gone through to help manufacturers upgrade. That's point of the article. Manufacturers aren't upgrading. They ship the device and wash their hands of it. Users on 2 year upgrade contracts are using ancient software versions on their phones. Read the article. -- Greg Donald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
