Ah, ok - I like this approach =] I'm a bit fuzzy on the implementation details, but I think I can figure this out.
Thanks! -Chad On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Nikolay Elenkov <nikolay.elen...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Chad Ata <chad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the response Nikolay, > > > > I was hoping to avoid server-side checks because I don't want potential > lag > > or bugs to affect the legit users. But I'll consider your suggestion if > this > > becomes a big problem for us. > > > > You could embed the hash as a resource with a non-obvious name, > and tripple-base64 encode it for extra fun if you don't want to use a > server. If they are changing/modifying your resources, it might be > better to store bits of it in code and calculate it dynamically > though. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
