That's fine. Appreciate your response. On Nov 20, 3:58 pm, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Efi Merdler-Kravitz > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > :-) > > Why do you think appbrain are not reliable ? > > Well, I suppose it depends on how you define "reliable". It is > absolutely reliable as a picture of the most popular devices among > AppBrain users, barring AppBrain screwing up the counts somehow. If > you believe that AppBrain users are representative of your target > audience, then it should be fine for you. I think AppBrain users are > not representative of the general Android user population (most of > whom have probably never heard of AppBrain), and so this data might > skew more towards more-powerful devices, but that's just me. > > Any survey, whether free or fancy-paid ones, will have some sort of > bias. The stuff on the Android developer site for API levels, for > example, is only for requests made to the Android Market and therefore > will miss Market-less devices (Kindle Fire, various flavors of Nook, > first-generation ARCHOS tablets, etc.). > > My apologies for the attitude I copped on my previous reply -- I'm a > bit short on sleep. > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons > Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://github.com/commonsguyhttp://commonsware.com/blog|http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ Version 3.6 Available!
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
