On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:38 PM, klewelling <klewell...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I understand you have some technical reservations but that >> > is for me to worry about:) >> >> I'm sure that CarrierIQ thinks the same thing. >> >> Surprisingly enough, I disagree with that opinion. > > Ouch! I don't think I made my point clear. By saying you had technical > reservations I wasn't referring to the security I was referring to the > application virtualization which you said "Only by writing custom > firmware, AFAIK.". You security concerns are very valid. Sorry for the > confusion.
Ah, OK. I interpreted your statement as more of "sod off", as the British might say. My apologies for my confusion. > For example I have an idea for a new > feature or layout design I want to see how people react. I make the > changes to my app and then distribute the new app to a small percent > of users. You can do this on an opt in basis. Then use analytics to > determine if users like the change or not. If they do like it update > the apk to the market to be distributed to everyone. I think there are other patterns for this, like betas, that have worked with success. Also, what you're describing is a more controlled scenario than what I inferred from a StumbleUpon-style service. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy Android Training...At Your Office: http://commonsware.com/training -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
