Apparently LVL isn't so hot at identifying licensed versus not licensed.
There have been various complaints about it not working well in the
forums over the past year.
On 12/15/2011 8:22 AM, James Black wrote:
Hello,
I currently have two applications that I am preparing to make
available, but it dawned on me that by using the LVL framework that I
could have one application and just give reduced functionality until
the user pays for more.
My application is a navigation-type application, and it would be
easy to just add a menu option to buy if they haven't, and to just
limit the functionality.
It would seem this would be a better route as then the user doesn't
have to download anything, and they can see what is available in the
paid app when there are new updates, and, most importantly, I would
only need to maintain one codebase.
But I expect there are some downsides I haven't seen yet, so I
thought I would ask.
Thank you.
--
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
- Robert McCloskey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
