Ah, right... Thanks for the clarification, Mark!
kris On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Kristopher Micinski > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Right..., but you shouldn't spawn a new process for each onReceieve... > > It is eminently possible, perhaps even likely, that each onReceive() > will wind up in a separate process. If there are no other components > running, Android will consider the process very eligible to be > terminated once onReceive() completes. > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) > http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy > http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ Version 3.7 Available! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
