2012/2/7 Kostya Vasilyev <[email protected]> > > > 7 февраля 2012 г. 19:03 пользователь Kristopher Micinski < > [email protected]> написал: > > >> By the way, 2G ram is not considered very much these days, (off topic but >> someone told me that android wouldn't even build on eight now..). To add >> to that, eclipse uses a fair amount of memory, and to get a usable system >> you'd want to bumb up to at least four I'd suspect. (And make sure you're >> running a device rather than the emulator!) >> > > Actually, looking in System Monitor under Debian/64 right now, I've only > got 1,6 G in use out of the 4 G installed in my system (running Chromium > with Gmail, Eclipse, and a couple of terminals). > > So, not denying the obvious that more physical memory is always better.... > > ... it's worthwhile checking Eclipse's memory settings. > > Running on a system with 32G of physical RAM and leaving Eclipse at its > default memory settings still won't do any good. > > Here is the relevant portion of my eclipse.ini: > > --launcher.XXMaxPermSize > 512m > --launcher.defaultAction > openFile > -vmargs > -Xms128m > -Xmx1024m > > This lets Eclipse use up to 1 GB of RAM and makes it much happier (as far > as my workspaces go). > > More info here: > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse.ini > > Agreed, the day that I upped my eclipse settings to use much more memory I felt like things got much faster, but I'm not convinced that this wasn't mostly placebo. However, I've since stopped using eclipse.
That being said, I think once you add in an emulator, eclipse, and whatever else he has running, you've probably got quite a hog. kris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
