Okay. Well I guess I'll get working on a new one. Thanks for the help! On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:00:04 PM UTC-4, Zsolt Vasvari wrote: > > If they do that, you can unpublish the new app. > > You should consider yourself lucky that your entire account didn't get > suspended and you have the option to actually uploading a new app. After > all, you have clearly violated one of the most important requirements. > > > On Thursday, March 29, 2012 8:42:55 AM UTC+8, Chris Gustafson wrote: >> >> I know that's an option, but I don't want to upload the app under a >> different package name and have Google re-instate it right after. But I may >> have no other option. >> >> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:38:31 AM UTC-4, Zsolt Vasvari wrote: >>> >>> 150? That's nothing. Just change the package name be done with it. >>> Waiting for Google to reply is a waste of your time and you will just >>> drive yourself up the wall. Even if you do get a response, in all >>> likelihood, it will be a form letter as they don't seem to actually read >>> what you are writing to them. >>> >>> Make the "Donate" option an in-app purchase via Google Play. You >>> didn't get suspended because your app was free and had a donate button, >>> but because you circumvented Google from receiving their 30% cut. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:13:02 AM UTC+8, Chris Gustafson wrote: >>>> >>>> I guess if that's their policy, then fine, I'll remove the feature and >>>> upload a new APK (which they suggested in the notification email). But I >>>> have no way of doing that since it's suspended. Other than changing the >>>> package name, but that would require the 150+ people who downloaded it to >>>> uninstall and re-install. Instead of just updating. >>>> >>>> Really wish they would just respond. :/ >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 7:01:02 PM UTC-4, Ali Chousein wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well, I guess Google is quite strict on this. If you get money from >>>>> users in any way, you have to pay Google the fee it's charging for >>>>> using the Google Play platform. I have no idea how to reach them to >>>>> discuss your case, but I see that what you did is indeed violation of >>>>> their policies. >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Ali Chousein >>>>> http://socialnav.blogspot.com | http://twitter.com/socialnav1 >>>>> http://weatherbuddy.blogspot.com | http://twitter.com/weather_buddy >>>>> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/android/PayGol-Android.aspx >>>>> http://geo-filtered-assistant.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 7:01:02 PM UTC-4, Ali Chousein wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well, I guess Google is quite strict on this. If you get money from >>>>> users in any way, you have to pay Google the fee it's charging for >>>>> using the Google Play platform. I have no idea how to reach them to >>>>> discuss your case, but I see that what you did is indeed violation of >>>>> their policies. >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Ali Chousein >>>>> http://socialnav.blogspot.com | http://twitter.com/socialnav1 >>>>> http://weatherbuddy.blogspot.com | http://twitter.com/weather_buddy >>>>> http://www.codeproject.com/KB/android/PayGol-Android.aspx >>>>> http://geo-filtered-assistant.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
