Well, if you feel setting yourself up for a sure-fire audit, go with this advice.
But I think it's more pragmatic to start with Google's number, and deduct as much "Commission" to match what you received, even if it's slightly more than 30%, like it was in my case. On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 2:49:12 AM UTC+8, niko20 wrote: > > Just go with whichever number is lowest. If your bank account > transactions were lower, use those, as you have bank records to back > it up if you get audited. If googles numbers are lower, use those as > the 1099-k will report them and can be used as "proof". But if they > did an audit they would still look at your actual bank numbers. > > -niko > > On Apr 13, 11:56 pm, John Coryat <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> we better start from the number appearing on the 1099-K as that's > what > > > > the IRS gets also. > > > > That's what we did. Don't want to mess with the IRS! > > > > -John Coryat On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 2:49:12 AM UTC+8, niko20 wrote: > > Just go with whichever number is lowest. If your bank account > transactions were lower, use those, as you have bank records to back > it up if you get audited. If googles numbers are lower, use those as > the 1099-k will report them and can be used as "proof". But if they > did an audit they would still look at your actual bank numbers. > > -niko > > On Apr 13, 11:56 pm, John Coryat <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> we better start from the number appearing on the 1099-K as that's > what > > > > the IRS gets also. > > > > That's what we did. Don't want to mess with the IRS! > > > > -John Coryat -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
