Yes, "strongly recommended against" is more realistic, and polite, than "universally a sign that the programmer took the cheap, unprofessional way out". Its good to see of other ways of handling corruption.
There's no doubt what the professional-opinion is in the episode when the OFF button is outlawed... On May 25, 6:42 pm, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Yan <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree it may be dirty and icky, but its presumptuous to state that "You > > should "absolutely *should not* be doing this." > > Not particularly. > > > There are many real-world > > situations where a program must be exited imediately or this call would not > > have been made available in the Android API. > > https://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thre...https://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thre... > > If the authors of Android (e.g., Ms. Hackborn) tell you not to do > something, you would be well advised to heed their warnings. > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons > Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://github.com/commonsguyhttp://commonsware.com/blog|http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > Android Training...At Your Office:http://commonsware.com/training -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
