Btw, I love how more and more I see people dragging out this quote every time they encounter some limit that they have to deal with, as if there should just not be limits on the resources they can use.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]>wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:59 AM, bob <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *“640K ought to be enough for anyone”* >> > Um, no. There is nothing similar to these two things. > > Our limit is: "devices don't have an infinite amount of RAM, applications > must be written to live within the available RAM on the device." > > In fact the RAM limit for applications has been steadily increasing over > time, and we don't have an upper limit on it that we think is the maximum > we will ever need. > > -- > Dianne Hackborn > Android framework engineer > [email protected] > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and > answer them. > > -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer [email protected] Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
