Jan Burse schrieb:
Mark Murphy schrieb:
custom signature-level permission
I was googling a little bit and found the following definition:
"A permission that the system grants only if the requesting
application is signed with the same certificate as the application that
declared the permission. If the certificates match, the system
automatically grants the permission without notifying the user or asking
for the user's explicit approval."
But the same certificate is also a prerequesite for sharedUserId
to work. So I don't see any harm in using sharedUserId. What is
exactly the threat of sharedUserId, except for the bug issues
already mentioned?
Bye
The same error, i.e. not providing a certificate, can be done
for both methods "custom signature-level permission" and "sharedUserId":
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/android-framework/GvdEIMlaOVg/discussion
Right?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
