On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Robert Marmaduke <[email protected]> wrote:
> My buddy and I are starting an app project. He's doing Win8, and I'm doing
> Android.
>

I'm not sure that's relevant, they are substantially APIs?

> For simple apps not requiring external keyboards, graphic tablets or
> pointing devices,
> where is the 'best' entry point viz simplicity of codex, versus upward
> porting ability?
>

Entry point in what sense?

> Our target audience would be 2.0, but if the app grows we'll want to port to
> 3.0 / 4.0.
> Is it simpler to code in 4.0, then limit functionality and down-port to 3.0,
> then 2.0??
>

you don't have to do anything to "port" the app up to 3.0/4.0.

If you need features in 2.3 (for example) then you can't use 2.0: if
you don't then stick with the widest audience.  It's simplest to code
with whatever API level gives you enough features for what you need.

> And is there an online sim for beta testing, or do we have to hunt-and-peck
> this puppy?
>

There are online services that will test your apps, I would recommend
testing on an actual device myself.  There are automated testing
solutions available, as well, for example monkeyrunner, etc..

> Last, is there an app library for remotely accessing and using Google
> Spreadsheets?
>

You're asking if Google docs has an API, I believe the answer is yes..

kris

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to