The use case is that the thread may want to call Activity.startActivity().
On Friday, September 7, 2012 11:35:50 AM UTC-5, Larry Meadors wrote: > > That's probably unsafe due to the lifecycle of activities. What's the use > case? > > Larry > > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:18 AM, bob <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > What do you normally do on Android when you spawn a thread but the > thread > > needs to access > > > > your Activity object? Do you typically pass the Activity object to your > own > > constructor for the Thread? > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Android Developers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]<javascript:> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <javascript:> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
