On Monday, September 24, 2012 1:22:40 PM UTC-7, Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:12 PM, UgglyNoodle > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > First, it would be nice to know whether I'm correct and these are in > fact > > bugs, or whether I'm doing something wrong. > > Have you tried returning POSITION_UNCHANGED for A instead of 0? I > doubt that it will help, but it is more in line with what the > documentation calls for. >
>From the source code, the behaviour is identical whether (newPos == PagerAdapter.POSITION_UNCHANGED) or (newPost == ii.position), so I think that the two approaches are equivalent. (Also, I just tested it, to be sure, and there was no change in behaviour.) > If they are bugs, can anyone > > suggest a workaround (other than debugging and rebuilding the support > > library myself)? > > Fork FragmentStatePagerAdapter, putting the fork in your project in > your own package, and modify to suit. > Thanks, I may end up using this approach. I'm just surprised that nobody has used getItemPosition(Object object) successfully before! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
