No, it's not redundant. There is something in Java called a *static inner class*.
It is basically a weird use of the word static. Please see this: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/javaOO/nested.html *A nested class is a member of its enclosing class. Non-static nested classes (inner classes) have access to other members of the enclosing class, even if they are declared private. Static nested classes do not have access to other members of the enclosing class. As a member of the OuterClass, a nested class can be declared private, public, protected, or package private.* On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 1:23:23 PM UTC-6, Lew wrote: > > Blake Meike wrote: > >> an inner class and *not* static). >> >> That's redundant. In Java, the definition of "inner class" is a > non-static nested class. > > -- > Lew > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
